Alcohol Testing in Child Custody: Each State’s Laws, Explained [2025]
Written by BACtrack Editorial Team
Updated November 15, 2024
Written by BACtrack Editorial Team
Updated November 15, 2024
This guide is designed for parents, legal professionals, and family counselors.
And the goal of this guide is to help you answer the question: How do family courts in my state address a parent’s alcohol abuse, and order alcohol testing in custody cases?
Here’s what you’ll see for each state listed below:
Keep reading:
Can a Recovering Alcoholic Get Custody?
Keep scrolling or find your state in the list above.
Download the one-pager on your state, which you can share or review with anyone involved in your custody case.
**But whatever you do: Remember to consult an attorney in your state for the most accurate information, and for advice on your particular case.**
Also, it’s important to understand that laws can vary from state to state. As you explore this guide, here are some common similarities and differences to look out for.
TIP: Check out our post on how to gather additional evidence of a parent’s drinking.

Relevant Alabama statutes don’t specifically single out alcohol use in custody decisions, but they provide broad discretion to judges to consider any factor that could impact the child’s welfare.
Yes.
Judges in Alabama can order alcohol testing even if the only evidence presented is an accusation, particularly if:
Case law supports the court’s authority to mandate testing and other interventions.

In Alaska, child custody decisions are guided by the “best interest of the child” standard. Courts will consider various factors, including the mental and emotional health of the parents, the stability of the home environment, and any history of substance abuse. Alaska law specifically mentions alcohol abuse, and allows the court to consider it when determining child custody arrangements.
Yes.
A judge can order alcohol testing based on an accusation of alcohol abuse, especially if the accusation is credible or supported by other evidence, such as prior incidents involving alcohol.

Arizona law specifically addresses issues related to substance abuse, including alcohol, in the context of child custody.
Yes.
In Arizona, a judge has the authority to order alcohol testing if there is a credible accusation.

Arkansas courts, when assessing the “best interests of the child” in custody cases, consider several factors, including each parent’s ability to provide a stable and safe environment for the child. Arkansas law explicitly addresses substance abuse, including alcohol, in the context of child custody.
Yes.
In Arkansas, a judge has the authority to order alcohol testing if there is a credible accusation of alcohol abuse, especially if the accusation is supported by evidence such as prior incidents, criminal records, or testimony from witnesses.
Arkansas has continued to enforce Act 604, which became effective in July 2021. This act establishes joint custody as the default arrangement in child custody cases, under the assumption that it is generally in the best interest of the child to maintain substantial contact with both parents. However, this can be contested if there is “clear and convincing evidence” that joint custody would not be in the child’s best interests, such as in cases involving abuse or significant parental conflict

Child custody decisions in California are made based on the “best interest of the child” standard, and alcohol use by a parent, particularly if it affects their ability to provide a safe and stable environment for the child, can significantly impact custody decisions. California law specifically outlines issues related to substance abuse, including alcohol, in the context of child custody. Key statutes include:
No.
Additional evidence is required. In fact, two recent California cases cemented this requirement (see below).

Colorado statutes do specifically discuss issues related to substance abuse and child custody.
Yes.
A judge in Colorado has the authority to order alcohol testing or monitoring if there is credible evidence or an accusation that a parent’s alcohol use could negatively affect their ability to care for their child. Case law in the state also supports the court’s discretion to order evaluations and take preventive measures to protect the child’s welfare.

Connecticut, like other states, evaluates child custody based on the “best interests of the child.” Furthermore, Connecticut law explicitly addresses substance abuse (alcohol included) in child custody.
Yes.
A judge in Connecticut can order alcohol testing if there is credible evidence or a reasonable accusation that a parent’s alcohol use could negatively affect their ability to care for their child.

Delaware law specifically pinpoints substance abuse as an important factor to consider, when assessing the best interests of the child.
Yes.
Judges in Delaware can order alcohol monitoring or testing if there is a reasonable belief that a parent’s alcohol use will impact their ability to care for their child.

Florida adheres to the “best interest of the child” standard, and discusses alcohol testing in its statutes:
No.
A claim (from, say, the other parent) on its own is not enough.0 Several significant court rulings (including the two listed below) indicated that clear, credible evidence must be presented before a judge can implement alcohol testing or monitoring.

Georgia law considers the best interests of the child and explicitly addresses substance abuse and alcohol, in regards to child custody.
Yes.
In Georgia, a judge can order alcohol testing for parents in child custody disputes if they believe either or both parents are abusing alcohol or drugs. The judge may also decide to order testing if one parent suspects the other of abuse or dependency.

Hawaii law addresses substance abuse, including alcohol, within the context of child custody through several statutes:
Yes.
The statutes provide the courts with the authority to order evaluations and take preventive measures to protect the child’s welfare.

Idaho law does specifically address substance abuse, including alcohol, within the context of child custody:
Yes.
In Idaho, a court can order alcohol testing and treatment for a parent based on an allegation. The court has the authority to determine how frequently the parent should be tested, decide who must pay for testing, and order random testing.

In Illinois, child custody statutes do specifically mention alcohol and substance abuse.
No.
There must be a “preponderance of evidence” that the parent’s alcohol use presents a significant problem for their child. However, in many custody cases involving alcohol, a Guardian Ad Litem (a court representative representing the child’s best interests) will be assigned. The Guardian Ad Litem, or “GAL,” can further investigate a parent’s alcohol abuse and order alcohol testing if they so choose.0

Indiana codes addressing child custody do outline alcohol and substance abuse.
No.
When a parent in Indiana needs to prove their sobriety, in the face of an allegation, they may request a Guardian Ad Litem to investigate the claim.0

Iowa codes do not explicitly mention alcohol use, but they do address any factors that may impact a child’s well-being.
Yes.
A judge may order alcohol testing based on an accusation if there is sufficient cause to believe that the parent’s alcohol use could endanger the child’s welfare.

In Kansas, child custody codes do not specifically mention substance abuse or alcohol. However, they do emphasize the importance of assessing a parent’s mental or physical health, which are impacted by substance abuse.
No.
Generally, a judge will require that any accusations be substantiated with considerable evidence. Then, if the judge believes the evidence carries weight, they may order alcohol or drug testing to definitely settle the claims.0

While Kentucky’s child custody codes do not specifically address substance abuse, they do discuss the mental and physical well-being of parents – which would encompass substance abuse issues like alcohol addiction.
Yes.
Kentucky courts have the discretion to order alcohol testing if there are concerns about a parent’s alcohol use. This can be based on accusations if the judge believes there is a valid concern for the child’s welfare.
It is important to note that, to encourage stability, parents must typically wait at least two years before requesting a modification to the original custody order. However, if a parent can prove that a child is being endangered by a parent’s substance abuse, they may be able to request a modification sooner.0

Louisiana codes regarding child custody do specifically outline substance abuse as a key factor to consider, when determining the child’s best interests.
No.
Alcohol and drug use, on its own, generally does not cause a parent to lose custody or all visitation rights.0 However, if a parent has a documented history of substance abuse that is proven to endanger their child, a judge may order supervised visitation or sole custody for the other parent.

In Maine, codes regarding child custody – referred to “physical residence” (physical custody) and “parental rights and responsibilities” (legal custody) – include special provisions for substance abuse.0
Yes.
Maine courts have the authority to order alcohol testing if there are concerns about a parent’s alcohol use.
A judge may also encourage a parent to participate in Family Recovery Court – a voluntary, specialty civil docket that requires parents to undergo alcohol or drug testing, meet with a case manager, and attend treatment.0

Maryland law does not have a specific statute that addresses alcohol use directly in the context of custody, but does more generally address the mental and physical well-being of the parents.
Generally, no.
A court will expect to see strong evidence to support any claims of alcohol abuse.0

In Massachusetts, alcohol or drug use is not explicitly mentioned within child custody codes. However, it is considered under the broader context of a parent’s ability to care for their child.
No.
Courts in Massachusetts will not automatically order alcohol or drug tests. However, if a judge adequate evidence of a parent’s substance abuse – via witness testimony, police records, medical records, etc. – they may order testing.0

In Michigan, child custody laws do not specifically address drug or alcohol addiction, but do pinpoint the “moral fitness,” as well as the physical and mental health of the parents, as important factors for judges to consider.
Yes.
A judge may request a drug or alcohol test, based on a suspicion on substance abuse. If alcohol use is raised as a concern, the court will evaluate its impact on the parent’s ability to care for the child, potentially leading to restrictions on custody or visitation rights.

Minnesota laws do not explicitly mention substance abuse as a key factor to consider, when evaluating the best interests of a child in a custody case.
Yes.
Minnesota courts have the discretion to order alcohol testing if there are concerns about a parent’s alcohol use.

Mississippi’s “best interests of the child” factors, also known as the Albright Factors, do not specifically mention substance abuse.
Yes.
This is particularly true if a parent has a history of substance abuse. However, an accused parent may respond by demonstrating a significant history of sobriety.0

While Missouri’s child custody codes do not specifically mention alcohol or drug abuse, judges typically address a parent’s addiction when evaluating their mental and physical health.
Yes.
If a judge deems the accusation to be credible, they may order an alcohol test.
In 2023, Missouri codes were changed to require judges to presume that 50/50 custody and parenting time is in the child’s best interest. But this assumption is “rebuttable.” Unequal parenting time may be awarded if a parent can prove, through significant evidence, that a child should be spending more time with one parent than the other.
When it comes to modifying an existing joint-custody order, Missouri courts have clarified that evidence must meet a “higher standard” and show a major change in circumstances. However, if a parent is only seeking to modify the parenting time schedule, they don’t have to demonstrate a major change.0

In Montana, child custody codes do explicitly mention substance abuse.
Yes.
A judge in Montana can issue an alcohol or drug test if they deem the accusations to be credible.
If the accusation is made during a hearing to modify a current custody order, the accusing parent must first provide evidence that there has been a significant change in circumstance that warrant a modification.0

Nebraska’s child custody laws do specifically acknowledge substance abuse, in certain sections.
Yes.
Nebraska courts have the discretion to order alcohol testing if there are concerns about a parent’s alcohol use.

Nevada’s child custody codes do explicitly account for substance abuse.
Yes.
A judge in Nevada can order an alcohol test at any time, during both initial custody proceedings and for modifications in custody.0
It is important to note that, although Nevada courts strongly prefer joint custody, they may award a parent primary (sole) custody if there is compelling evidence that a parent cannot care for their child “at least 40% of the time.”0

In New Hampshire, child custody laws do specifically address substance abuse.
Yes.
According to New Hampshire Revised Statutes § 169-C:12-d, New Hampshire courts can order testing at any point, if there is “reason to believe” that a parent’s alcohol usage is interfering with their ability to care for their child.0

New Jersey’s custody laws do not specifically address substance abuse, but do require judges to assess whether a parents are “unfit.”
No.
A judge will not order testing without a hearing, in which both sides can plead their case. The judge must first receive evidence of a parent’s alcohol or drug abuse before ordering testing, which may include: a documented history of substance abuse, eyewitness statements, social media posts, criminal records related to the substance abuse, and more.0 Then, they may order a custody evaluation.

Child custody laws in New Mexico do not explicitly name substance abuse as a factor determine the child’s best interests, but do account for the parents’ ability to provide “adequate care” for the child – which substance abuse may impede.
Yes.
If a parent accuses the other of alcohol abuse, the judge will likely order testing to investigate the claim.0

There is no defined list of factors judges must use to determine the best interests of the child, but courts in New York do take drug and alcohol abuse seriously.
No.
Generally, judges in New York can order examinations when a person’s physical or mental health is under question. However, courts in New York have ruled that judges may not order alcohol or drug testing “virtually at the whim” of the other parent – they must provide compelling evidence.0

Custody laws in North Carolina do specifically address alcohol abuse and even alcohol monitoring.
Yes.
A family court judge in North Carolina may order testing for drugs or alcohol, if they believe they must do so to protect the child, based on an accusation. However, a judge will generally request evidence and examine the circumstances to determine whether testing is necessary.0

In North Dakota, laws regarding custody – referred to as “parental rights and responsibilities” within the state – do specifically mention substance abuse.
Yes.
North Dakota courts have the discretion to order alcohol testing if there are concerns about a parent’s alcohol use. They may order the parent to participate in the 24/7 Sobriety Program, which administers alcohol and drug tests.0

In Ohio, laws for child custody – referred to as “parental rights and responsibilities” within the state – do address substance abuse.
No.
Generally, evidence must be presented to support the accusation, which may include a history of substance abuse.

Oklahoma’s child custody laws do outline policies addressing drug and alcohol abuse, specifically.
Yes.
Code 43 Okla. Stat. § 110.2 permits judges to order testing in both visitation and custody cases, and does not require any evidence of substance abuse to be submitted beforehand.

While Oregon’s child custody codes do not explicitly mention substance abuse, a parent’s addiction can still be taken into account under Oregon law.
Generally, no.
A parent must provide significant evidence of alcohol addiction, and how the parent’s drinking might harm the child.0

Pennsylvania’s custody codes do explicitly mention substance abuse, as a key factor for judges to consider when awarding custody.
Generally, no.
A judge in Pennsylvania will want to investigate the validity of the claim before making a decision, and whether or not the parent has a history of substance abuse. If they decide these claims have merit, a judge will likely order testing – for example, prior to visitation. A Pennsylvania judge may also order a parent to undergo rehabilitation before they are awarded custody.0

Rhode Island custody law does acknowledge drug and alcohol use as an important factor for judges to consider.
Yes.
In order to confirm whether or not an allegation is true, a judge may order a one-time alcohol test or alcohol monitoring. Another note: Judges in Rhode Island do not generally order a parent to attend rehab, unless child protective services become involved.0

South Carolina does specifically mention substance abuse within its child custody codes.
No.
A parent must typically provide strong evidence of substance abuse to justify testing.0

In South Dakota, child custody and placement laws explicitly address drug and alcohol abuse.
Yes.
South Dakota courts may order alcohol testing even if an instance of abuse or neglect related to alcohol consumption (as explained in § 26-8A-34) is “alleged.”

Tennessee’s child custody codes do specifically address alcohol and drug abuse.
Yes.
If the court receives an allegation of alcohol abuse, they may order the parent to undergo testing.0

Child custody codes in Texas do not explicitly address substance abuse – however, Texas courts do take drug and alcohol abuse seriously (see court rulings below).
No.
In fact, several court rulings (see below) have indicated that a judge must receive clear evidence of an alcohol problem before they can order testing, and that – if they do – they must order the “least intrusive” testing method.

Utah’s laws do explicitly mention substance abuse as an important factor to consider when determining the best interests of the child.
Yes.
However, judges in Utah will typically only grant a request for alcohol testing if they believe the request was made “in good faith.”0
If there is sufficient evidence that a parent is endangering their child by abusing alcohol, that parent may be considered an “unfit parent” and lose custody or visitation rights.0

Vermont laws addressing custody, referred to as parental rights and responsibilities in the state, do somewhat cover substance abuse.
Generally, no.
If both parents agree on a parenting plan, a judge in Vermont will usually accept that agreement as being in the child’s best interests. However, if parents cannot agree on a joint parenting plan – that may, for example, involve alcohol testing – both parties can present evidence in a hearing to support their requests.0

Yes.
The clause above (§ 16.1-278.15) gives the court broad leeway in deciding whether alcohol testing is warranted. It also does not specify under which circumstances, exactly, a court may order testing; so, an accusation alone could presumably be enough.

Washington’s child custody laws do explicitly mention drug and alcohol abuse.
Yes.
The clause mentioned above (§ 26.12.170) grants the court wide discretion in deciding whether to administer alcohol or drug testing.

West Virginia’s custody laws do specifically address substance abuse.
Yes.
However, West Virginia statutes explain that any parent found to have fraudulently reported anything to the court may be penalized.

Wisconsin’s laws do explicitly address substance abuse, in the context of custody.
Yes.
However, Wisconsin courts will usually require a parent to provide evidence and clear reasons to back up the allegation, before they mandate alcohol testing.0

Yes.
Family courts in Wyoming are granted broad leeway when assessing the best interests of the child. However, recent rulings (see below) have asserted that courts have overstepped their bounds when ordering alcohol testing.
✓
Court Approved Nationwide
✓
No Activation Fees or Long-term Contracts
✓
Free Smartphone Breathalyzer